Working Paper
State sales taxes can add substantially to the cost of an item. However, a multichannel retailer that does not have a warehouse, office, or retail store in a state does not have to collect sales taxes. But when a retailer establishes its first physical presence in a state, such as a retail store, it is obligated to collect sales taxes on all Internet and catalog orders shipped to that state.
Here, authors Anderson, Fong, Simester, and Tucker analyze purchase behavior among 13,021 customers who live on either side of a border of the “focal” state in which a retailer opened its new store. Their study focuses on two questions: Does collecting sales taxes have a negative impact on sales through Internet and catalog channels? Are direct retailers less likely to establish a physical presence in high tax states?
They find that while Internet purchases decrease significantly (by 16%), there is no apparent effect on catalog purchases. The absence of any change in catalog purchases can be attributed to both search difficulty and incentive to search for lower prices at competing retailers. If search is difficult because it requires access to competitors’ catalogs, or if there is little incentive to search because prices are unlikely to be lower elsewhere, then the tax effects are mitigated.
At the firm level they find that retailers that have a larger proportion of direct sales are less likely to enter a state with high sales taxes.
The authors conclude that current U.S. sales tax laws have significant effects on both customer and firm behavior.
About the authors
Eric T. Anderson is
Associate Professor of
Marketing, Kellogg
Graduate School of
Management,
Northwestern University.
Nathan M. Fong
is a doctoral student,
Duncan I. Simester
is Professor of
Management Science,
and Catherine E. Tucker
is Assistant Professor of
Marketing, all at the
MIT Sloan School of
Management.
Comments from members
Please login to view and/or submit comments